The FBI has been rounding up more potential "lone wolf" terrorists,
Congressional leaders and the Justice Department say, in response to the
perception of a mounting threat of domestic attacks inspired by the
Islamic State.
Since the thwarted attack on a "Draw Muhammad" conference in Garland,
Texas, on May 3, the Justice Department has announced the arrests of 10
individuals it says were inspired by and supporting the Islamic State.
The lawmakers say there have been more arrests that have not yet been
announced.
They say the FBI has shifted its approach toward arrests rather than
keeping suspects under surveillance, and is also targeting individuals
thought to be planning attacks in the U.S., unlike the bureau's past
focus on volunteers preparing to join ISIS's fight abroad.
"Lately, we have seen an uptick in the number of arrests of ISIL
followers who were planning violent acts in our homeland," said John
Carlin, the assistant attorney general for national security. "ISIL,
differing from some other foreign terrorist organizations, has
demonstrated that they see value in mobilizing sympathizers anywhere in
the world."
The spate of arrests comes in response to what Congressional leaders
and the Justice Department say is a mounting threat that radicalized
Americans will attempt low-tech, lone wolf attacks in the near
future. Lawmakers see the changes as necessary because the Islamic State
uses social media so effectively to radicalize Americans and because
the group is getting better at using encryption to shield its
communications with new recruits.
The shift has downsides. An emphasis on arrests rather than
surveillance limits intelligence gathering. Arresting suspected recruits
before they've acted makes prosecuting them more difficult. It could
also violate the First Amendment right to free expression, if terrorist
sympathizers are treated as terrorist supporters.
The recent arrests are "an indication that the increased number of
threads of threats … is at the highest level that most of us have seen
since 9/11," Chairman Richard Burr of the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence told us in an interview.
His comments track with those of his House counterpart Devin Nunes, who said earlier this week that the country is at a higher risk of terrorism than ever before.
In almost all of the FBI's recent terrorism arrests, the suspects are
charged with providing material support for a terrorist group, a
catch-all charge that can mean providing travel documents and cash to
would-be terrorists or trying to recruit new adherents.
Burr vigorously defended the approach, telling us, "There is a sufficient case there to be made with every one of them."
Some watchdogs see the "material support" charge as prone to overuse.
Hina Shamsi, the director of the American Civil Liberties Union's
national security project, told us that the statute has been interpreted
expansively by the Justice Department since 9/11, and applied
especially to Muslims. She said that now the charge of providing
material support to a terrorist group "seems increasingly targeted at
people's online expression or association, without sufficient connection
to actual wrongdoing."
One hard case may end up being that of Ali Shukri Amin, a 17-year-old
from Manassas, Virginia, who pleaded guilty to providing material
support to the Islamic State through his use of social media. Part of
Amin's guilty plea acknowledged using his Twitter account to provide
potential Islamic State recruits instructions on how to use the virtual
currency bitcoin and to help recruits travel to Syria.
In other recent cases, the Justice Department accuses Americans of
planning to do violence directly. Justin Nojan Sullivan, a 19-year-old
from Morgantown, North Carolina, was arrested
in his home on June 19. Carlin said in a statement this week that
Sullivan would be charged with "planning assassinations and violent
attacks in the United States." The FBI also alleges that Usaamah Abdullah Rahim, the 26-year-old killed by an FBI agent in Boston on June 2, was involved with two other local men in planning a killing spree inside the U.S.
Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate committee, told us
that the intelligence reporting about potential domestic attacks by
ISIS-inspired lone wolves has been at a high pitch over the last two
months.
"There's been a lot of intelligence that showed they are going to try
to attack police, military, as well as others," she said. "Nothing is
specific; that's the problem. But I think it's a correct thing to take
it seriously and do everything you can to prevent one from happening."
Other top Democrats noted the need to balance preventing attacks
against the need to gather more information about the Islamic State and
its presence in the U.S., as well as build cases that can lead to
convictions.
"It's a mixed bag because obviously you don't want to wait too long,"
said Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House
Intelligence Committee. "On the other hand if you act too early, you may
not have a prosecutable case, like if people are just expressing some
kind of affinity for the social media."
The calculation by intelligence and law enforcement agencies has
changed in part, he said, because the Islamic State is more interested
in inspiring simple, one-off, low-level attacks than groups like
al-Qaeda, which has preferred dramatic, high-casualty operations.
Also, there's lots of evidence
that recent lone wolf attacks in Canada, Australia and France involved
some level of social media incitement, if not direct contact with
Islamic State social media operatives.
"That has caused our law enforcement to go back over their list of
people who had come to our attention and perhaps not wait until they act
out and attempt to nip these cases in the bud," Schiff said.
Several U.S. officials and members of Congress have discussed openly
how the Islamic State uses social media to lure young people to commit
jihad. But monitoring such activity is complicated by the Islamic
State's use of encryption software and tools that erase records of a
conversation.
Representative Mike McCaul, the Republican chairman of the House
Homeland Security Committee, has called these encrypted communications
"dark spaces" because the FBI cannot eavesdrop on these communications.
At a June 3 hearing before McCaul's committee, the bureau's assistant
director for counterterrorism, Michael Steinbach, acknowledged that the
FBI could not monitor much of the Islamic State's encrypted chats.
One senior U.S. intelligence official told us that the inability to
listen in on these conversations -- where law enforcement officials
suspect more detailed recruitment occurs -- has caused a panic inside
the U.S. intelligence community.
Blocked from some conversations, the FBI is taking part in others --
perhaps even impersonating Islamic State social media accounts. After
the bureau arrested Amir Said Abdul Rahman al-Ghazi, a 38-year-old from
North Olmstead, Ohio, the announcement said al-Ghazi "communicated with
individuals he believed to be members of ISIL in the Middle
East and took steps to create propaganda videos for ISIL." The FBI is
also charging Abdul Rahman with selling marijuana.
Despite the increase in arrests and the government's more aggressive
actions to quash online incitement at earlier stages, many in Washington
believe that the threat from the Islamic State is only growing and that
there's just no way America's law enforcement and intelligence agencies
can keep pace. FBI Director James Comey has said the group is
recruiting in all 50 states.
"There are more of these guys to follow than we can possibly follow,"
Senator Lindsey Graham told us. "It's just a matter of time before one
of them penetrates the net." He advocates deploying 10,000 U.S. troops
to Iraq to fight the Islamic State at its source, and he faults Obama
for not doing so.
Democrats acknowledge that the problem is only getting worse, but they disagree with hawks like Graham.
"There's merit to the argument that the longer that ISIS carries on,
the more we are going to have to deal with this continual threat of ISIS
social media inspired radicalism," Schiff said. "But that doesn't mean
we have to be sending in the Marines."
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-06-25/fbi-rounding-up-islamic-state-suspects
No comments:
Post a Comment