According to ICSR Director Peter Neumann, who authored the report
(.pdf), just over 30 percent of the defectors from the Islamic State
are Syrian citizens, while one in four were born in other Middle Eastern
countries. Neumann told a press conference held in London on Monday
that many of the defectors saw life under the rule of the Islamic State
as too austere. They also believed that the group was too unforgiving
against fellow Sunni Muslims who did not agree with its stern doctrine.
Some of the defectors complained that Islamic State commanders were more
interested in launching attacks against other Sunni rebel groups than
against the government of Syria, which is ostensibly the Islamic State’s
foremost rival. Additionally, some defectors said that Islamic State
commanders were obsessed and paranoid about alleged traitors and spies
within the group’s ranks, and that they often ordered the execution of
Islamic State fighters based on little or no evidence.
A smaller number of defectors said they
had experienced racism from other Islamic State members, while others
said that combat duties under Islamic State command was neither
action-filled nor heroic. Moreover, luxury goods looted from civilians
were rarely handed down to regular Islamic State troops by their
commanders. Some defectors also stated that non-Arab fighters were used
“as cannon fodder” by the Islamic State in battles that took place in
Syria and Iraq. Neumann told reporters on Monday that the ICSR study
challenged the portrayal of harmony and dedication that the Islamic
State had carefully cultivated on social media.
No comments:
Post a Comment