Feb 15 (Reuters) - Iran is pursuing a nuclear agreement with the U.S. that delivers economic benefits for both sides, an Iranian diplomat was reported as saying on Sunday, days before a second round of talks between Tehran and Washington.
Sunday, February 15, 2026
Iran says potential energy, mining and aircraft deals on table in talks with US
Over 6,000 people killed in three days as Sudanese city of Al Fashir was attacked by paramilitary group, says UN
More than 6,000 people were killed in three days when a Sudanese paramilitary group took control of the key city of Al Fashir last October, the United Nations has said.
The offensive by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) included widespread atrocities that amounted to war crimes and possible crimes against humanity, the UN Human Rights Office said in a report.
Rights violations in the final push for the city in Sudan underscored how "persistent impunity fuels continued cycles of violence", according to UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk.
The RSF and their allied Arab militias, known as Janjaweed, overran Al Fashir, the Sudanese army's only remaining stronghold in Darfur, on 26 October 2025 and rampaged through the city and its surroundings.
It had previously been under siege for more than 18 months.
The UN Human Rights Office said it documented the killing of at least 4,400 people inside the city between 25 October and 27 October, while more than 1,600 were killed as they were trying to flee the RSF rampage.
The 29-page UN report detailed atrocities that it said ranged from mass killings, summary executions, sexual violence, abductions for ransom, torture and ill-treatment to detention and disappearances.
In many cases, the attacks were ethnicity-motivated, it said.
Sexual violence, including rape and gang rape, was apparently widespread during the Al Fashir offensive, with RSF fighters and their allied militias targeting women and girls, the report added.
The RSF did not respond to an emailed request for comment.
The alleged atrocities in Al Fashir, the provincial capital of North Darfur, mirror a pattern of RSF conduct in other areas in its war against the Sudanese army, the report said.
The tribal militia turned paramilitary is known to document its own war crimes.
Videos of their fighters lynching women, lashing emergency responders and cheering over dead bodies have circulated online since the start of the conflict.
The war began in April 2023 when a power struggle between the two sides led to open fighting in the capital, Khartoum, and elsewhere across the country.
The conflict created the world's largest humanitarian crisis, with parts of the nation pushed into famine.
It has also been marked by atrocities, which the International Criminal Court said it was investigating as war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has been accused of backing the RSF, something that an RSF intelligence officer appeared to confirm in an exclusive interview with Sky News.
But the UAE's foreign ministry hit back at the allegations, saying: "We categorically reject any claims of providing any form of support to either warring party since the onset of the civil war."
How Porton Down scientists exposed Putin’s chemical weapons arsenal
Alexei Navalny, who died while imprisoned in the Arctic, seen in a Moscow court in 2021 - Alexander Zemlianichenko/AP Photo
In their high-security base in the Wiltshire countryside, the scientists of Porton Down made an astonishing discovery.
Tissue samples taken from the body of Alexei Navalny, the Russian opposition leader, and smuggled out of Russia showed he had been assassinated using the toxin produced by an Ecuadorian poison dart frog.
Eight years ago, scientists at the Ministry of Defence research centre revealed that the nerve agent Novichok had been used in the attempted killing of KGB defector Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury.
The finding was central to establishing that Russia was responsible for the failed assassination, which resulted in the death of innocent bystander Dawn Sturgess.
It called into question whether Moscow had been telling the truth when it claimed in 2017 to have destroyed its chemical weapons in line with the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, which bans them.
But the British scientists have now left the Foreign Office convinced Vladimir Putin is indeed in possession of illegal chemical weapons – made in secret laboratories for use against his enemies at home and abroad.
Navalny was 47 when he died at a high-security Arctic prison in February 2024 after years of accusing the Russian president and the Kremlin of corruption.
He had fallen suddenly ill while exercising outside. Escorted back to his cell, the dissident began vomiting as he writhed in pain on the floor. His sudden collapse, loss of consciousness and the failure of resuscitation efforts aroused suspicions.
State investigators, however, dismissed them, saying instead that his death was caused by arrhythmia, an abnormal heart rhythm, and another medical condition. His body was released to his family, and he was buried after a Russian Orthodox funeral service.
It was then that his supporters embarked on a daring mission to show the world what really happened to a man who has been hailed as “the fiercest advocate for Russian democracy”.
Tissue samples were surreptitiously taken, smuggled out of Russia and secretly transferred across Europe to Porton Down, one of the world’s leading centres of scientific research.
The headquarters of the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) hosts some of the UK’s most advanced chemical laboratory capabilities, and researchers at the secretive base have a deep expertise in testing for chemical and biological weapons.
Deploying newly discovered toxicology techniques, researchers concluded that Navalny’s sudden collapse was caused by epibatidine, a toxin produced by the Ecuadorian poison dart frog.
The results, confirmed through collaboration with Sweden, France, the Netherlands and Germany, were shocking.
First discovered in the 1970s, the toxin is a fast-acting nicotinic receptor agonist which was first considered for use as a painkiller due to its numbing effects.
Those efforts were abandoned because in large doses it can cause death within 30 minutes by triggering respiratory failure, convulsions and paralysis.
There was “no innocent explanation” for the toxin – which is 200 times more potent than morphine, not native to Russia and is only found in wild frogs – being in Navalny’s body, the Government said.
Although a well-known poison, it does not appear to have ever been used in targeted killings before – at least that the West knows of.
There is a question mark over whether it was chosen for use because it is hard to detect, in which case Russia would not have expected the West to have the technical capabilities to identify that it had been used.
It is not impossible, however, that it was chosen precisely so that it would be uncovered as a calling card – a show of strength and ingenuity intended to signal Russian power.
Col Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, the former commanding officer of the UK’s Joint Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear Regiment, said: “This is a classic FSB/GRU [Russian security services] modus operandi, using deadly toxins and chemical weapons.
“But it also shows how leaky and pretty inept the Russian secret service is, that we know so much detail.”
Such a message would have been intended to intimidate the West and neighbouring former Soviet nations which Russia believes rightfully belong to its sphere of influence, as well as the Russian public amid rising discontent over the war in Ukraine and the flatlining economy.
“By using this form of poison, the Russian state demonstrated the despicable tools it has at its disposal and the overwhelming fear it has of political opposition,” Yvette Cooper, the Foreign Secretary, said on Saturday.
The toxin’s development in sufficient quantities for an assassination would have required serious technical capabilities – most likely a special laboratory – which put to bed the notion that Russia has abandoned its arsenal of chemical weapons.
It has shed light on the breadth of the Kremlin’s chemical stockpile, and revealed the extent of their expertise in chemical weapons production.
“This is not something you order online,” one specialist told Russian outlet The Insider. “You would need a state-level chemical programme or access to an advanced research laboratory. The number of actors capable of synthesising and weaponising epibatidine is extremely small.”
The tightly controlled environment in the Arctic prison where Navalny was held gave the Russian state free rein over when it would attempt to kill him.
In a joint statement, the foreign ministers of France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and Britain said Moscow had “the means, motive and opportunity to administer this poison to him”.
Attention will now turn to the consequences Putin faces for his use of banned chemical weapons, which contradicts Russia’s claim that it had disposed of all 40,000 tonnes of toxins it inherited from the Soviet Union.
Since then, Moscow has used Novichok against the Skripals in 2018, as well as on Navalny on a flight to Munich in 2020. In addition to the use of ebipatidine to kill Navalny, it has also deployed chloropicrin, a potentially fatal First World War choking agent, during the war in Ukraine.
Mr de Bretton-Gordon said: “This confirms what we were all thinking, that Russia’s chemical weapons programme is almost certainly extant and of course they are using industrial amounts of chemical weapons in Ukraine.”
As well as the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, Russia is a signatory to the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, which also prohibits the use of such weapons.
“Russia is a signatory of both, so if it was behind the poisoning of Navalny it has broken treaties it has sworn to uphold,” said Prof Alastair Hay, a British toxicology expert.
The conventions do not include a system of sanctions for non-compliance, and instead direct complaints to the United Nations Security Council, of which Russia is a permanent member. The council can recommend the imposition of sanctions following an investigation.
“These latest findings once again underline the need to hold Russia accountable for its repeated violations of the Chemical Weapons Convention and, in this instance, the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention,” the foreign ministers’ joint statement said.
“Our permanent representatives to the organisation for the prohibition of chemical weapons have written today to the director-general to inform him of this Russian breach of the Chemical Weapons Convention.
“We are further concerned that Russia did not destroy all of its chemical weapons. our partners and we will make use of all policy levers at our disposal to continue to hold Russia to account.”
Story by Timothy Sigsworth, Rozina Sabur, James Rothwell
How Porton Down scientists exposed Putin’s chemical weapons arsenal
Saturday, February 14, 2026
Iran has chosen its protest scapegoats. Now they face execution
The phone calls, when they came, lasted three minutes.
In those minutes, a young woman told her mother she was alive. A son told his parents he was exhausted, and said that if the security forces wanted to execute him, they should, for at least then he’d be free.
It has been nearly a month since Venus Hossein-Nejad, 28, and Peyvand Naeimi, 30, were marched out of their workplaces by Iranian agents and held prisoner as part of the regime’s crackdown against the widespread protests threatening the Islamic Republic.
For days, their families had heard nothing from them. But then Ms Hossein-Nejad and Mr Naeimi, both from Iran’s Baha’i religious minority, appeared on a prime-time state television programme.
Their faces were blurred, their words scripted by interrogators, they confessed to having organised the mass protests that were sweeping Iran.
Credit: IRIB
Their families told The Telegraph that every word was forced, and that it was another example of the Iranian regime blaming the Baha’is for crises.
They said Iranian security forces were using them as scapegoats for the protests that saw more than 7,000 people killed, trusted rights groups say, and tens of thousands arrested.
Ms Hossein-Nejad and Mr Naeimi’s families now fear they will be executed by the clerical establishment for crimes they did not commit. They had never been at the protests they were accused of masterminding.
“This is another attempt by the Iranian government to falsify the truth and present falsehoods to its own public,” said Simin Fahandej, the Baha’i International Community’s representative to the United Nations in Geneva.
“During every period of national crisis, whether social, economic or political, the Iranian authorities consistently and systematically scapegoat the Baha’is. This is a repeated pattern, and we are seeing it again.”
The Baha’is have endured decades of abuse under the Islamic Republic. Families have reported parents and children being detained and taken to undisclosed locations after masked officers seized their religious texts, which are seen as contraband.
Ms Hossein-Nejad was yet another victim of the Islamist regime. She was taken away from the accounting firm where she worked by plain-clothes officers from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’s (IRGC) intelligence unit and driven away in a car.
For the next 15 days, her family heard nothing of her.
Her parents, Nahid Shabani and Enayatollah Hosseini-Nejad, spent those days moving between courts and judicial offices in search of their daughter.
They were told, at each stop, that no such person existed in any file they could access. It was only later that the family learned the IRGC had taken her.
When she was allowed to call home, her mother got three minutes every few days. She could only confirm she was alive. She could not name where she was, describe her interrogations or explain the condition she was in.
Negar, Ms Hossein-Nejad’s cousin, said she was an artist who spent her free hours painting, and a professional who had almost completed her certification as a swimming instructor. As a Baha’i, she had been barred by law from attending university in Iran.
Instead, she built her career instead through private training and years of independent work. She had managed a bipolar disorder diagnosis for 12 years with consistent medication and psychiatric care. In detention, her family fears, she has had access to neither.
“She wasn’t picked up in the protest,” Negar told The Telegraph. “She wasn’t organising anything. Under pressure, they made her confess that she was organising all these things that she wasn’t. That’s not at all what she was into.”
On Feb 1, Ms Hossein-Nejad appeared on Channel Two of Iran’s state television network during the evening political news programme.
She confessed to organising the protests. She described alleged collaboration with foreign governments and involvement in arson.
Her parents watched. Then they wrote a letter, a copy of which was sent to The Telegraph.
“During one of her phone calls, she tearfully informed us that she had been subjected to severe physical and psychological pressure,” wrote Ms Shabani and Mr Hosseini-Nejad.
“She said that due to the intensity of these pressures, she was forced to declare her ‘cooperation’ solely to escape the unbearable conditions. This fabricated video was clearly prepared to falsely implicate detainees – paving the way for unjust, severe and predetermined sentences.”
“At present,” they warned, “our daughter’s life is in grave and immediate danger.”
Mr Naeimi was taken at 2pm on Jan 8, hours before the protests he would later be accused of organising even began.
Eight plain-clothes agents arrived at his workplace in Kerman with two vehicles and no arrest warrant. When he refused to hand over his phone, they took it from him by force.
They filmed the detention as it happened. Then he, too, was gone.
His cousin described how the 30-year-old had been subjected to years of discrimination at the hands of the Islamic Republic.
As a boy, Mr Naeimi had been a gifted swimmer, training several hours daily, sometimes twice a day. He was selected repeatedly for national and international competitions.
Each time, he prepared. Each time, on the day, someone else was sent in his place – because he was a Baha’i.
He became a dog trainer instead, building his own business after early employers withheld his wages. He competed and won. Authorities shut his business down. He became a mechanic.
His younger brother, Rozhin, described him as the source of creativity in their family – a man who met every closed door with something new.
Like Ms Hossein-Nejad, Mr Naeimi was denied a university education because of his faith. Like her, he never tried to leave.
“He really loved Iran very deeply,” Rozhin told The Telegraph. “Even despite all that was happening to him from childhood until right now, he never chose to leave the country. It was very easy for him. He never did.”
After three days of no contact, Mr Naeimi was allowed a 30-second call. He could not answer his parents’ questions. After 19 days, they learned he was being held in an IRGC intelligence detention centre.
That same day, in a brief call, he spoke in terms his family recognised as signs of what had been done to him.
“I’m exhausted, and I will cooperate with them,” Rozhin quoted him as saying. “I will do whatever they want and say whatever they want. Even if they want to execute me, let them execute me, so that I can be relieved. My soul will be freed from the cage of my body.”
In a later call, he asked urgently whether a friend of his had also been arrested, the relief noticeable in his voice when his parents told him the friend was free.
The Baha’i International Community said that the forced confessions were a significant escalation but not a departure in the government’s handling of the community during moments of national stress.
Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the group said, the pattern has been consistent: crisis arrives, and the Baha’is are blamed.
Shia Islam is the state religion in Iran. The constitution recognises several minority faiths, including Christianity, Judaism and Zoroastrianism, but not the Baha’i faith.
Baha’is in Iran face systematic persecution, including restrictions on education, employment and religious practice.
“The Baha’is in Iran, despite the false accusations and cruel persecutions they have faced, have only acted with resilience and service to their country and have never responded with violence,” Ms Fahandej said. “Their record of refusing to deny their beliefs in return for every worldly benefit shows their commitment above all to the principle of truthfulness.”
Ms Hossein-Nejad is still in solitary confinement. Her medications are still out of reach. Mr Naeimi is still in an IRGC intelligence detention centre.
The mood on the streets is grief for thousands of young women and men killed last month by the security forces.
Iran has chosen its protest scapegoats. Now they face execution
Russia killed Alexei Navalny with dart frog poison, UK and allies say
Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny died in prison in Russia after being poisoned with a deadly toxin found in the skin of Ecuadorian dart frogs, the UK and other allies have revealed.
The "barbaric" act - using a neurotoxin that is classed as a chemical weapon - could only have been carried out by Vladimir Putin's government, they said on Saturday.
The poisoning, "highly likely", resulted in Mr Navalny's death.
Sky News understands it is likely the toxin was manufactured in a laboratory rather than actually taken from the frogs
It is not clear how the frog poison - called epibatidine - was allegedly administered to the dissident, who had been in a penal colony in Siberia when he died almost exactly two years ago.
Indigenous tribes in South America are said to use the toxin in blow darts or blowguns when they hunt.
The poison - described as "one of the deadliest on earth" - is 200 times stronger than morphine. It causes paralysis, breathing difficulties and death.
Russia killed Alexei Navalny with dart frog poison, UK and allies say | World News | Sky News
Russia poisoned Navalny with dart frog toxin, UK says
Russia poisoned Navalny with dart frog toxin, UK says
Putin arch-rival Alexei Navalny died after being poisoned with a lethal toxin and Russia is to blame for the attack, Britain and its European allies have said.
In a dramatic press conference held at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday, the UK, France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands said that analysis of samples from Navalny’s body had found the presence of epibatidine – a deadly toxin found in poison dart frogs in South America.
After the findings were announced by Navalny’s widow Yulia Navalnaya, foreign secretary Yvette Cooper pinned the blame squarely on the Kremlin and said only Russia had the “means, motive and opportunity” to carry out such an attack.
She said: “Today, beside his widow, the UK is shining a light on the Kremlin’s barbaric plot to silence his voice. Russia saw Navalny as a threat. By using this form of poison, the Russian state demonstrated the despicable tools it has at its disposal and the overwhelming fear it has of political opposition.”
The five countries said Russia had shown a “repeated disregard for international law” and that they had reported the poisoning to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.
After the press conference, Ms Navalnaya called for Vladimir Putin to be “held accountable”. She wrote: “I was certain from the first day that my husband had been poisoned, but now there is proof: Putin killed Alexei with chemical weapon.”
Ms Navalnaya previously announced her husband’s death at the same gathering, two years ago. The Kremlin has always denied any involvement.
Navalny, a thorn in the side of the Kremlin who crusaded against official corruption and staged massive anti-Putin protests, died in a penal colony in Siberia in February 2024, aged 47. The former lawyer had been serving a 19-year sentence on charges he believed to be politically motivated.
It is not clear how the frog poison was allegedly administered to Navalny. But the allies also pointed to an attempt to poison Navalny with the nerve agent novichok in 2020, which followed the Salisbury poisonings in 2018.
Ms Navalnaya said last year that two independent labs had found that her husband was poisoned shortly before his death. It had been widely assumed that Navalny had been poisoned by the Russian state, but evidence of the specific poison in his body, along with the statement by the European countries, is a new development.
In her statement, she added: “I am grateful to the European states for the meticulous work they carried out over two years, and for uncovering the truth. Vladimir Putin is a murderer. He must be held accountable for all his crimes.”
The Foreign Office said there can be no innocent explanation for the toxin having been found in Navalny’s body.
Ms Cooper added: “Since Yulia Navalnaya announced the loss of her husband here in Munich two years ago, the UK has pursued the truth of Alexei Navalny’s death with fierce determination. Only the Russian government had the means, motive and opportunity to deploy this lethal toxin against Alexei Navalny during his imprisonment in Russia.”
Navalny’s death came after Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with novichok in July 2018. Last year, a major inquiry into the poisonings found that Putin had ordered the “astonishingly reckless” attempted assassination of Mr Skripal as a “public demonstration of Russian power”.
The report also said the Russian president was “morally responsible” for the death of Dawn Sturgess, an innocent bystander who died after being exposed to the chemical weapon after it was left in a discarded perfume bottle.
Russia was also responsible for the assassination of former spy Alexander Litvinenko in the UK, according to the European Court of Human Rights. The 43-year-old, who had worked for the Russian security services before defecting to the UK, died after drinking green tea laced with poison in London in 2006.
The joint statement by the five countries said they are “confident that Alexei Navalny was poisoned with a lethal toxin”.
It added: “This is the conclusion of our governments based on analyses of samples from Alexei Navalny. These analyses have conclusively confirmed the presence of epibatidine. Epibatidine is a toxin found in poison dart frogs in South America. It is not found naturally in Russia.
“Russia claimed that Navalny died of natural causes. But given the toxicity of epibatidine and reported symptoms, poisoning was highly likely the cause of his death. Navalny died while held in prison, meaning Russia had the means, motive and opportunity to administer this poison to him.”

