Saturday, February 14, 2026

Iran has chosen its protest scapegoats. Now they face execution

 The phone calls, when they came, lasted three minutes.

In those minutes, a young woman told her mother she was alive. A son told his parents he was exhausted, and said that if the security forces wanted to execute him, they should, for at least then he’d be free.

It has been nearly a month since Venus Hossein-Nejad, 28, and Peyvand Naeimi, 30, were marched out of their workplaces by Iranian agents and held prisoner as part of the regime’s crackdown against the widespread protests threatening the Islamic Republic.


For days, their families had heard nothing from them. But then Ms Hossein-Nejad and Mr Naeimi, both from Iran’s Baha’i religious minority, appeared on a prime-time state television programme.

Their faces were blurred, their words scripted by interrogators, they confessed to having organised the mass protests that were sweeping Iran.

Credit: IRIB

Their families told The Telegraph that every word was forced, and that it was another example of the Iranian regime blaming the Baha’is for crises.

They said Iranian security forces were using them as scapegoats for the protests that saw more than 7,000 people killed, trusted rights groups say, and tens of thousands arrested.

Ms Hossein-Nejad and Mr Naeimi’s families now fear they will be executed by the clerical establishment for crimes they did not commit. They had never been at the protests they were accused of masterminding.

“This is another attempt by the Iranian government to falsify the truth and present falsehoods to its own public,” said Simin Fahandej, the Baha’i International Community’s representative to the United Nations in Geneva.

“During every period of national crisis, whether social, economic or political, the Iranian authorities consistently and systematically scapegoat the Baha’is. This is a repeated pattern, and we are seeing it again.”

The Baha’is have endured decades of abuse under the Islamic Republic. Families have reported parents and children being detained and taken to undisclosed locations after masked officers seized their religious texts, which are seen as contraband.

Ms Hossein-Nejad was yet another victim of the Islamist regime. She was taken away from the accounting firm where she worked by plain-clothes officers from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’s (IRGC) intelligence unit and driven away in a car.

For the next 15 days, her family heard nothing of her.

Her parents, Nahid Shabani and Enayatollah Hosseini-Nejad, spent those days moving between courts and judicial offices in search of their daughter.

They were told, at each stop, that no such person existed in any file they could access. It was only later that the family learned the IRGC had taken her.

When she was allowed to call home, her mother got three minutes every few days. She could only confirm she was alive. She could not name where she was, describe her interrogations or explain the condition she was in.

Negar, Ms Hossein-Nejad’s cousin, said she was an artist who spent her free hours painting, and a professional who had almost completed her certification as a swimming instructor. As a Baha’i, she had been barred by law from attending university in Iran.

Instead, she built her career instead through private training and years of independent work. She had managed a bipolar disorder diagnosis for 12 years with consistent medication and psychiatric care. In detention, her family fears, she has had access to neither.

“She wasn’t picked up in the protest,” Negar told The Telegraph. “She wasn’t organising anything. Under pressure, they made her confess that she was organising all these things that she wasn’t. That’s not at all what she was into.”

On Feb 1, Ms Hossein-Nejad appeared on Channel Two of Iran’s state television network during the evening political news programme.

She confessed to organising the protests. She described alleged collaboration with foreign governments and involvement in arson.

Her parents watched. Then they wrote a letter, a copy of which was sent to The Telegraph.

“During one of her phone calls, she tearfully informed us that she had been subjected to severe physical and psychological pressure,” wrote Ms Shabani and Mr Hosseini-Nejad.

“She said that due to the intensity of these pressures, she was forced to declare her ‘cooperation’ solely to escape the unbearable conditions. This fabricated video was clearly prepared to falsely implicate detainees – paving the way for unjust, severe and predetermined sentences.”

“At present,” they warned, “our daughter’s life is in grave and immediate danger.”

Mr Naeimi was taken at 2pm on Jan 8, hours before the protests he would later be accused of organising even began.

Eight plain-clothes agents arrived at his workplace in Kerman with two vehicles and no arrest warrant. When he refused to hand over his phone, they took it from him by force.

They filmed the detention as it happened. Then he, too, was gone.

His cousin described how the 30-year-old had been subjected to years of discrimination at the hands of the Islamic Republic.

As a boy, Mr Naeimi had been a gifted swimmer, training several hours daily, sometimes twice a day. He was selected repeatedly for national and international competitions.

Each time, he prepared. Each time, on the day, someone else was sent in his place – because he was a Baha’i.

He became a dog trainer instead, building his own business after early employers withheld his wages. He competed and won. Authorities shut his business down. He became a mechanic.

His younger brother, Rozhin, described him as the source of creativity in their family – a man who met every closed door with something new.

Like Ms Hossein-Nejad, Mr Naeimi was denied a university education because of his faith. Like her, he never tried to leave.

“He really loved Iran very deeply,” Rozhin told The Telegraph. “Even despite all that was happening to him from childhood until right now, he never chose to leave the country. It was very easy for him. He never did.”

After three days of no contact, Mr Naeimi was allowed a 30-second call. He could not answer his parents’ questions. After 19 days, they learned he was being held in an IRGC intelligence detention centre.

That same day, in a brief call, he spoke in terms his family recognised as signs of what had been done to him.

“I’m exhausted, and I will cooperate with them,” Rozhin quoted him as saying. “I will do whatever they want and say whatever they want. Even if they want to execute me, let them execute me, so that I can be relieved. My soul will be freed from the cage of my body.”

In a later call, he asked urgently whether a friend of his had also been arrested, the relief noticeable in his voice when his parents told him the friend was free.

The Baha’i International Community said that the forced confessions were a significant escalation but not a departure in the government’s handling of the community during moments of national stress.

Since the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the group said, the pattern has been consistent: crisis arrives, and the Baha’is are blamed.

Shia Islam is the state religion in Iran. The constitution recognises several minority faiths, including Christianity, Judaism and Zoroastrianism, but not the Baha’i faith.

Baha’is in Iran face systematic persecution, including restrictions on education, employment and religious practice.

“The Baha’is in Iran, despite the false accusations and cruel persecutions they have faced, have only acted with resilience and service to their country and have never responded with violence,” Ms Fahandej said. “Their record of refusing to deny their beliefs in return for every worldly benefit shows their commitment above all to the principle of truthfulness.”

Ms Hossein-Nejad is still in solitary confinement. Her medications are still out of reach. Mr Naeimi is still in an IRGC intelligence detention centre.

The mood on the streets is grief for thousands of young women and men killed last month by the security forces.

Iran has chosen its protest scapegoats. Now they face execution

Russia killed Alexei Navalny with dart frog poison, UK and allies say



Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny died in prison in Russia after being poisoned with a deadly toxin found in the skin of Ecuadorian dart frogs, the UK and other allies have revealed.

The "barbaric" act - using a neurotoxin that is classed as a chemical weapon - could only have been carried out by Vladimir Putin's government, they said on Saturday.

The poisoning, "highly likely", resulted in Mr Navalny's death.

Sky News understands it is likely the toxin was manufactured in a laboratory rather than actually taken from the frogs

It is not clear how the frog poison - called epibatidine - was allegedly administered to the dissident, who had been in a penal colony in Siberia when he died almost exactly two years ago.

Indigenous tribes in South America are said to use the toxin in blow darts or blowguns when they hunt.

The poison - described as "one of the deadliest on earth" - is 200 times stronger than morphine. It causes paralysis, breathing difficulties and death.

Russia killed Alexei Navalny with dart frog poison, UK and allies say | World News | Sky News


 

Russia poisoned Navalny with dart frog toxin, UK says

 Russia poisoned Navalny with dart frog toxin, UK says

Putin arch-rival Alexei Navalny died after being poisoned with a lethal toxin and Russia is to blame for the attack, Britain and its European allies have said.

In a dramatic press conference held at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday, the UK, France, Germany, Sweden and the Netherlands said that analysis of samples from Navalny’s body had found the presence of epibatidine – a deadly toxin found in poison dart frogs in South America.



After the findings were announced by Navalny’s widow Yulia Navalnaya, foreign secretary Yvette Cooper pinned the blame squarely on the Kremlin and said only Russia had the “means, motive and opportunity” to carry out such an attack.

She said: “Today, beside his widow, the UK is shining a light on the Kremlin’s barbaric plot to silence his voice. Russia saw Navalny as a threat. By using this form of poison, the Russian state demonstrated the despicable tools it has at its disposal and the overwhelming fear it has of political opposition.”

The five countries said Russia had shown a “repeated disregard for international law” and that they had reported the poisoning to the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

After the press conference, Ms Navalnaya called for Vladimir Putin to be “held accountable”. She wrote: “I was certain from the first day that my husband had been poisoned, but now there is proof: Putin killed Alexei with chemical weapon.”

Ms Navalnaya previously announced her husband’s death at the same gathering, two years ago. The Kremlin has always denied any involvement.

Navalny, a thorn in the side of the Kremlin who crusaded against official corruption and staged massive anti-Putin protests, died in a penal colony in Siberia in February 2024, aged 47. The former lawyer had been serving a 19-year sentence on charges he believed to be politically motivated.

It is not clear how the frog poison was allegedly administered to Navalny. But the allies also pointed to an attempt to poison Navalny with the nerve agent novichok in 2020, which followed the Salisbury poisonings in 2018.

Ms Navalnaya said last year that two independent labs had found that her husband was poisoned shortly before his death. It had been widely assumed that Navalny had been poisoned by the Russian state, but evidence of the specific poison in his body, along with the statement by the European countries, is a new development.

In her statement, she added: “I am grateful to the European states for the meticulous work they carried out over two years, and for uncovering the truth. Vladimir Putin is a murderer. He must be held accountable for all his crimes.”

The Foreign Office said there can be no innocent explanation for the toxin having been found in Navalny’s body.



Ms Cooper added: “Since Yulia Navalnaya announced the loss of her husband here in Munich two years ago, the UK has pursued the truth of Alexei Navalny’s death with fierce determination. Only the Russian government had the means, motive and opportunity to deploy this lethal toxin against Alexei Navalny during his imprisonment in Russia.”

Navalny’s death came after Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia were poisoned with novichok in July 2018. Last year, a major inquiry into the poisonings found that Putin had ordered the “astonishingly reckless” attempted assassination of Mr Skripal as a “public demonstration of Russian power”.

The report also said the Russian president was “morally responsible” for the death of Dawn Sturgess, an innocent bystander who died after being exposed to the chemical weapon after it was left in a discarded perfume bottle.

Russia was also responsible for the assassination of former spy Alexander Litvinenko in the UK, according to the European Court of Human Rights. The 43-year-old, who had worked for the Russian security services before defecting to the UK, died after drinking green tea laced with poison in London in 2006.

The joint statement by the five countries said they are “confident that Alexei Navalny was poisoned with a lethal toxin”.

It added: “This is the conclusion of our governments based on analyses of samples from Alexei Navalny. These analyses have conclusively confirmed the presence of epibatidine. Epibatidine is a toxin found in poison dart frogs in South America. It is not found naturally in Russia.

“Russia claimed that Navalny died of natural causes. But given the toxicity of epibatidine and reported symptoms, poisoning was highly likely the cause of his death. Navalny died while held in prison, meaning Russia had the means, motive and opportunity to administer this poison to him.”

France arrests alleged Chinese spies living in small village—four arrests so far



FOUR MEN HAVE BEEN arrested in France on suspicion of spying for China using a system of parabolic antennas and computers installed at a rented property in the French countryside. The men were arrested last Saturday and Sunday by the General Directorate for Internal Security (DGSI), which focuses on counterterrorism and counterespionage.

Two of the arrests took place on-site at a property in Camblanes-et-Meynac, a picturesque village located around 10 miles from Bordeaux in south-western France’s Gironde region. The property had reportedly been rented through the rental broker application Airbnb by two Chinese nationals who arrived in France in January. They are believed to have entered the country using work visas as engineers for a wireless telecommunications firm.

After settling in Camblanes-et-Meynac, the men erected a large parabolic antenna system in the garden of the rented property. The move reportedly alarmed locals, who noticed that their own Internet service experienced disruptions following the erection of the parabolic antenna system by the Chinese nationals. A local family proceeded to alert local authorities about the antenna.

According to reports, the DGSI arrested two Chinese nationals aged 27 and 29, while also seizing a substantial quantity of computer and satellite equipment that was found on the property. Two other men, reportedly “of Chinese origin” but based in France, were also arrested over the weekend. They were charged with providing assistance to the two residents of the Airbnb property by illegally importing the satellite equipment installed on the property. Their identities have not been released by the authorities.

The French prosecutor’s office stated that the suspects were engaged in efforts to “capture satellite data from the Starlink [mobile broadband] network”. They were also allegedly trying to intercept communications data from “vital entities” in the military realm and “retransmit them to their country of origin”, namely China, according to the statement. They are now in custody, facing charges of “delivering information to a foreign power […] likely to damage the interests” of France—a standard phraseology used in the French legal code to describe foreign espionage.

France’s Gironde region has long been an epicentre of espionage by international actors due to its proximity to a growing number of facilities and restricted sites related to critical telecommunication, aerospace, and defence industries. Several small towns and villages in the area are in proximity to the industrial core of France’s defence, space and aeronautics operations.

Author: Joseph Fitsanakis 



 

Starmer sends UK strike group to Arctic, cites rising Russia threat as Trump pushes Greenland deal

Keir Starmer announces UK to send warships to northern waters in major security move

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the United Kingdom will deploy its aircraft carrier strike group to the North Atlantic and the High North later this year, marking a show of force as security tensions escalate across Europe.

Speaking on Saturday at the annual Munich Security Conference in Germany, Starmer said the mission would be led by HMS Prince of Wales and carried out alongside the U.S., Canada and other NATO allies.

"I can announce today that the U.K. will deploy our carrier strike group to the North Atlantic and the High North this year, led by HMS Prince of Wales, operating alongside the U.S., Canada and other NATO allies, in a powerful show of our commitment to Euro-atlantic security," Starmer told the high-profile forum aimed at strengthening European defense and diplomatic ties.

His announcement came in a speech where the PM also warned Europe must be ready to "fight" to deter Russian aggression in the event of a peace deal with Ukraine.

Announcing the warships, he said: "I can announce today that the UK will deploy our carrier strike group to the North Atlantic and High North region this year, led by the HMS Prince of Wales, operating alongside the US, Canada and other NATO allies in a powerful show of our commitment to Euro-Atlantic security".


Mr. Starmer told European leaders they must not dither as “Russia has proved its appetite for aggression”, and pledged Britain would defend its allies if called upon.

Earlier, the PM said: “To break the convention of a thousand speeches, we are not at a crossroads. The road ahead is straight and it is clear. We must build our hard power, because that is the currency of the age. We must be able to deter aggression , and, yes, if necessary, we must be ready to fight.

“Because we know that in a dangerous world, we would not take control by turning inward, we would surrender it, and I won’t let that happen.

“That’s why I devote time as Prime Minister to Britain’s leadership on the world stage, and that’s why I’m here today, because I am clear there is no British security without Europe and no European security without Britain. That is the lesson of history, and is today’s reality as well.”

The PM also faced questions about his difficult week, in which the Scottish leader Anas Sarwar called for him to resign. Asked whether his domestic challenges left him vulnerable, the PM insisted he “ended the week much stronger than I started it.”

He added: “And that’s a very good place to be, and my party and my Government is completely united on the question of Ukraine and defence and security and the need for stronger relations with Europe on defence, on security and on economy as well. And so I think that there is real strength in the position I’ve now set out.”

Speaking before the PM, the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio hit out at the mistakes of Western nations over the past 40 years, and snubbed a Ukraine meeting at the conference on Friday. US officials reportedly blamed scheduling conflicts but his absence may have been seen by Europeans as a sign of the White House’s dwindling interest in including them in its bid to end the conflict.

Earlier Defence Secretary John Healey said Britain would spend £400million developing long-range missiles this year to bolster European security. The cash will go towards next generation replacements of Storm Shadow missiles, which have been used by Ukraine to fire deep into Russia.